AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Cakewalk by bandlab vs reaper3/22/2023 ![]() ![]() Reaper, either one will let you make music. At the moment, most of my work is in Studio One because it has particular features that I find essential - but those same features might be irrelevant to other people.Īs to Cakewalk vs. Admittedly, I've been doing this a long time, so it's clear to me what I need to do, and which tools are best to do what's needed for me. To think that "one DAW rules them all" can prevent you from seeing the solution that's going to work best for you. The point is there are many ways to approach solutions. Do live sets in Live, record them, then import into Studio One for mastering. In those days, Sonar was IMHO a better mixing environment than Studio One and handled MIDI better, but Studio One had better mastering, analytics, and export functions (like DDP for CD duplication houses). This was an incredibly efficient workflow that took advantage of what both programs had to offer. I could make the tweaks on the Sonar-generated tracks in Studio One, and bounce over to Studio One's mastering page. As I mastered, if I needed to make tweaks, I didn't have to go back into Sonar, do another mix, export the mix, etc. ![]() So, I could take advantage of Studio One's Song page/Mastering page synergy. Over the years I realized I could do most of the work in Sonar, then export what I had done as tracks that I could then import into Studio One. The reason why was mastering in Studio One, multitrack in Sonar. I've used both Sonar and Studio One since version 1.0. Can I mix mastering with Cakewalk? So I'll choose Cakewalk ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |